Interconnection Agreements between Competing Internet Service Providers
نویسندگان
چکیده
The wide area networks, which make up the infrastructure of the Internet, connect at peering points that are either publicly or privately owned. Public peering points have become increasingly congested and offer poor connectivity and availability. Consequently, private agreements for increased interconnection capacity between network firms have become common. These agreements affect the quality of service and profits of the networks in different ways. To examine these issues, we construct a model of the economy in which two networks with different number of hosts are serving the same region and customers pick the network that offers them the most net benefit. We find that the network that hosts more content prefers a lower interconnection capacity than the other network. Consumers on that network see an increase in the congestion of their home network as a larger number of users from the other network gain easier access with an increase in interconnection capacity. On the other hand, consumers on the network with fewer hosts benefit greatly from increases in peering point capacity from private agreements.
منابع مشابه
Economizing ISP interconnections at Internet Exchange Points
The Internet service provider market is very competitive. Small and medium-size Internet service providers (ISPs) are competing for customers, while, at the same time, they are under price pressure from upstream providers. Therefore, these ISPs have to reduce their overall cost of interconnection. In order to address this issue, Internet exchange points (IXPs) have been built up in recent years...
متن کاملTowards sustainable quality of service in interconnection agreements: Implications from information asymmetry
This paper analyses the structure of the Internet marketplace and the business relationships of key players involved in network services provision. A brief overview of existing pricing policies and research work in this area is presented and some new issues are introduced. We believe that the role of information asymmetry is critical when considering agreements for Internet access and interconn...
متن کاملPaid Peering and Content Delivery
Recent conflicts between big content and service providers (CSPs) like Netflix, transit providers (TPs), and Internet service providers (ISPs) have generated considerate media attention and ignited a debate on interconnection agreements, market power of last-mile ISPs and net neutrality. We propose an experimental design to analyze a stylized interconnection market that captures key aspects of ...
متن کاملCritical Business Decisions for Internet Services
INTRODUCTION Critical business and user decisions greatly affect the development of the Internet infrastructure. Because the Internet marketplace is competitive and decentralized, an Internet Service Provider or other business' Internet interconnection agreements determines user performance, cost structure, and ultimately profitability. As the Internet evolves from best effort services to integ...
متن کاملA Model for Interconnection of IP Networks
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must interconnect in order to realize the network externality benefits of being able to reach all users. Market power determines whether and how much one provider pays another for interconnection. Recently, antitrust authorities have expressed concern about the potential abuse of market power with respect to network interconnection in the scope of the Internet....
متن کامل